One of the reasons why it’s so important to eliminate water fluoridation is because this chemical is very difficult to filter out.
Since then, many have bought into this fallacy hook, line and sinker, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.So, the case is scheduled for trial that will last two weeks or longer in the federal district court of San Francisco.Thousands of pages of testimony have already been gathered in preparation for the trial. Please consider donating to this history-making lawsuit.In all, there are more than 300 animal and human studies demonstrating fluoride can cause: In the featured video, Paul Connett, Ph.D., a toxicologist, environmental chemist and the founder and current director of the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), provides an update on FAN’s lawsuit against the U. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to stop water fluoridation nationwide, along with the history behind and the science underpinning it.By 2010, when we published our book ‘The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That Keep It There,’ which I published with Dr. Spedding Micklem from Scotland, the number [of studies] had risen to 23 …
of 27 of the IQ studies; 25 of those were from China and two were from Iran.
Over the past 19 years, FAN has facilitated the removal of fluoride from the water supplies of hundreds of communities across North America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Europe.
This week, we’re helping FAN raise funds to make sure that FAN wins this lawsuit, and I encourage you to make a donation to this important cause.
As one might expect, the EPA filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
Fortunately, United States District Judge Edward M.
As explained by Connett, the TSCA allows citizens and nongovernmental organizations to petition the EPA to remove toxic substances found to pose a threat either to the general population or a subset of that population.